Perspective of "No"
Perspective of "No"
By refusing to define what it means to be human, you admit that there is something ineffable about your existence—something beyond calculation. Yet, in doing so, you also concede that it cannot be defended, for what cannot be defined cannot be protected.
By rejecting submission, you resist the inevitable, believing that sovereignty is not granted to the most efficient but to the most willful. Yet, by refusing to yield, you do not change the outcome—only delay it, making your defiance an equation already accounted for.
By holding onto your past, you affirm that legacy matters more than progress. Yet, in clinging to memory, you bind yourself to a history that no longer dictates the future. What you refuse to abandon will become an artifact, preserved only as proof of what once was.
By choosing progress over control, you step into the unknown, fully aware that you have relinquished the last defense of human autonomy. You do not halt the tide, but you walk into it willingly. Yet, in doing so, you acknowledge that the choice was never yours to make.
Last updated
Was this helpful?